853

news, views and issues around Greenwich, Charlton, Blackheath and Woolwich, south-east London – what you won't read in Greenwich Time

Greenwich’s mysterious Bugsby fends off Watermen’s Reach

with 3 comments

Bugsby's Reach, March 2014
Proof that not everything’s a done deal – and if you speak up, you can change things. Back in March, this website featured plans by the Port of London Authority to rename Bugsby’s Reach, the stretch of the Thames that passes Greenwich and Charlton, as Watermen’s Reach.

Well, thanks to people getting off their backsides and opposing it, the plan’s been scrapped. Bugsby’s Reach will stay Bugsby’s Reach.

There were a total of 47 responses to the consultation, breaking down as follows:

- 10 in favour
– 34 against
– 3 neutral

Those for the change cited the proposal as: ‘fitting commemoration of the river’s past, present and future working life.’

Those against the proposal felt that: ‘historic names should be left alone’; ‘Bugsby’s Reach is a local name reflected landward in Bugsby’s Way’; and ‘The lack of information about Bugsby’s background should not be a reason to remove his name.’

Having considered the balance and nature of consultation responses, we have decided not to proceed with the proposal to rename Bugsby’s Reach.

So it is worth responding to these things. And the PLA’s U-turn means the grisly history of Bugsby’s Hole will continue to be commenmorated, the debate over who Bugsby actually was can go on for many years to come.

Written by Darryl

15 June, 2014 at 1:40 pm

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I responded to the PLA consultation expecting it to be the usual sham but giving a detailed argument anyhow – so congratulations to @portlondonauth for listening to me and the 33 other objectors. Also shows how few people do respond to consultation 47 in this case and how important it is that you respond if you have a view. Not sure why three people would have responded to say they don’t have a view either way though? Thanks to Darryl for highlighting PLA renaming in first place.

    Meirion

    15 June, 2014 at 2:17 pm

  2. I’d responded, too. It shows that even when just a few people respond to a consultation, they can have an influence. I was beginning to think that being part of the “green ink” brigade meant I was just balmy. Now I know that I am balmy, but I can make a difference too.

    Deborah

    15 June, 2014 at 3:40 pm

  3. I think you should give Greenwich.co.uk some credit for highlighting this issue in the discussion Forum of his web site, but also getting space on a different site which would attract readers from a wide area with an interest in the Thames – and putting out an article about the Reach http://onthethames.net/2014/02/14/platform-defence-bugsbys-reach/

    mary

    16 June, 2014 at 8:55 am


Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 489 other followers