Revealed: Greenwich Council’s Eltham ‘DLR on stilts’ report

As Greenwich’s Labour councillors get ready to vote tonight on whether or not they’ll give long-serving leader Chris Roberts the heave-ho, here’s an example of the secretive culture that challenger John Fahy wants to overturn.

Last December, the council agreed to spend £45,000 on further studies into a possible DLR extension to Eltham, which would utilise the tunnel Boris Johnson wants to build on the Greenwich Peninsula (Labour’s Ken Livingstone is opposed to the tunnel) before running above the A102 and A2 to Falconwood.

It’d already spent £25,000 on commissioning a preliminary study – but can Greenwich council taxpayers study the report on its website? Nope.

Indeed, if you ask the council for the report, it’ll only send a hard copy to you. So I’ve scanned it in anyway – so, for the first time in public, here’s the Eltham ‘DLR on stilts’ report (PDF, 18.3MB) produced for Greenwich Council by Hyder Consulting. Apologies for the occasional wonky page.

A few things are striking about the report, notably the warnings about how difficult construction would be; one proposal would involve demolition around the Woolwich Road roundabout in east Greenwich, while the vexed question of just how the line would negotiate the area around Eltham station, where the A2 runs in a tunnel, is deemed too tricky to answer. The line would also have to be 12-15 metres above the A102 through Charlton and Blackheath.

Routes suggested include a line through the Millennium Retail Park in east Greenwich, but a proposal for a single-track terminus at Falconwood would surely limit its capacity. But there’s no thought here to just where DLR trains would go to once they depart North Greenwich – with Bank and Tower Gateway surely at capacity, they would presumably have to squeeze up to Stratford International.

Anyhow, take a read and decide for yourself. You might also like to compare it with Lewisham Council’s report into Bakerloo Line extensions, which also deals with areas in Greenwich borough. And hopefully, after tonight, we’ll get a council that publishes this stuff as a matter of course. Fingers crossed.

9 comments

  1. methers

    Thank you for keeping us informed Darryl, when the council would rather we were kept in the dark. You’re doing true public service on our behalf.

  2. Pingback: Ken Livingstone brings London mayoral campaign to Royal Greenwich | Greenwich.co.uk
  3. Pingback: The leader’s friends: Greenwich Council relaunches Silvertown push « 853
  4. Pingback: Greenwich Council: ‘We’ll build our own river crossing’ | 853
  5. Pingback: Why Greenwich Peninsula is going in the wrong direction | 853
  6. Pingback: Greenwich Council discusses cycling, councillors fail to show | 853
  7. Pingback: Greenwich and Woolwich Foot Tunnels report released | 853
  8. Pingback: A week to go: Greenwich Council rushing through Ikea scheme | 853
  9. Pingback: Buried Greenwich Council report criticises Silvertown Tunnel | 853

Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s