853

news, views and issues around Greenwich, Charlton, Blackheath and Woolwich, south-east London – what you won't read in Greenwich Time

Free tickets – but what’s with Greenwich’s Olympics secrecy?

with 7 comments

Games bosses woo Greenwich with free tickets,” yells today’s Evening Standard, with news that Greenwich Council has been given “thousands of tickets” for “a top-class horse-riding event in the park”.

Actually, news about the Olympic test events in early July was all announced three weeks ago, but then news of south-east London has traditionally reached the Standard in a similar way to a dispatch from the deepest, remotest jungle. That said, it didn’t get a huge amount of coverage back then. (I was laid up with a cold and couldn’t make the launch, unfortunately, although it wasn’t as if I’d been invited…)

Confirmation on just how Greenwich Council will dish out these tickets is awaited, and I’m sure the park’s neighbours will be watching closely.

But how are things going preparing Greenwich Park for the Olympics, and how can you feed into the discussions about how we’ll cope with a huge global sporting event on our doorstep? How can you find out what’s being said?

It’s not as easy as you’d hope. Local consultation is being conducted through the Local Societies Consultative Group, a body set up by Greenwich Council after the equestrian events got planning permission twelve months ago. The group is solely for “local societies” – that’d be the Friends of Greenwich Park, the Greenwich Society, the Westcombe Society, and the Blackheath Society. If you don’t pay to be a member of any of these bodies, you’re shut out of these meetings.

You can find out bits of what happened at these meetings if you dig into the Friends of Greenwich Park website, but there’s no minutes published anywhere, even though this is a group set up by Greenwich Council about an event of huge public significance.

Well, until now, that is. After putting in a Freedom of Information Act request, I can present to you…

Local Societies Consultative Group minutes, 11th November 2010 (Word document)
Local Societies Consultative Group minutes, 17th January 2011 (Word document)

I should warn you that there isn’t any real scandal in these documents, unless you can find something I can’t see. But what surprises me is that none of the nine Greenwich councillors who represent the wards adjacent to the parks are involved in this process – yet these are the people who really represent us, not the societies. Why is this? After all, as I found 18 months ago when I was barred access to a meeting put on by LOCOG for these self-selecting groups, they’re not exactly the most open of bodies.

According to Greenwich Council, there have been no meetings since, and there are no plans to publish the minutes of these meetings on the council’s website.

So, the next time this group meets, and if someone wants to find out what happens, the council will have to go through the cost and aggravation of answering a Freedom of Information request to publish something which really should be in the public domain anyway.

Why all the secrecy? If there’s nothing to hide, why not just publish these minutes on the council website, and be as open about the Olympics as possible?

Written by Darryl

24 March, 2011 at 2:07 pm

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Darryl, LOCOG don’t yet have planning permission for the Test Event. Just saying.

    Indigo

    24 March, 2011 at 3:58 pm

  2. Looking at the minutes of 17 January 2011,

    “Circus field will not be used for test event, however is still reserved for games time.”

    Er, LOCOG has not yet even applied for consent to use Circus Field. This came to light at a presentation given by LOCOG to the Blackheath Joint Working Party on 17 March 2011.

    Not for LOCOG to “reserve”.

    Indigo

    24 March, 2011 at 4:02 pm

  3. Indeed, the test events are off to the planning board. Fun, fun, fun.

    Darryl

    24 March, 2011 at 4:10 pm

  4. This is really interesting in relation to other “Friends of” type groups in relation to public consultation, planning events, planning. I used to belong to a few and the only time when I brought this democratic defict up was when someone rejected asking the rest of the community their views on a particularly thorny issue. The self-appointed “chair”‘s line was that they didn’t count as if they were interested they would belong to “his” group. Says it all really.

    Lucy Neville

    24 March, 2011 at 4:51 pm

  5. [...] as in the East End with the marathon, and just as with the council-backed secrecy surrounding planning for Greenwich Park, it’s starting to look like London 2012 is taking residents for [...]

  6. [...] from a LOCOG briefing for amenity society members in 2009. Even those lucky enough to be on the inside with LOCOG are getting hacked off with [...]

  7. Hi,
    I have been trying to get to the bottom of the free ticket saga for some weeks. No one will confirm exactly how they are to be allocated or whether it is a measly 200 per event per day or how many tickets are available in total (many thousand I hear) and who has been given the rest? And Greenwich is a huge borough. So if oversubscribed (which is highly likely) what happens then? So I too made a FOI request about this subject and am looking forward to a response. I find it very bizarre how the whole thing is veiled in secrecy.

    Samantha

    19 May, 2011 at 12:20 pm


Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 491 other followers