853

news, views and issues around Greenwich, Charlton, Blackheath and Woolwich, south-east London – what you won't read in Greenwich Time

Why is Boris taking money for TfL from Iran’s Press TV?

with 6 comments

A little question came to mind when I took a ride on the Tube at the weekend…

It was bloody stupid for Ken Livingstone to get involved with Press TV, a channel backed by the Iranian government. Taking money from stone-throwing bigots isn’t wise when you’re seeking election to the London mayoralty. And as Adam Bienkov points out, it involves associating yourself with some dodgy characters, like cat-chops above, and a disreputable figure associated with SE London – that’s right, disgraced ex-Old Bexley and Sidcup MP Derek Conway.

So why is Boris Johnson taking their money too, in the form of ads on the London Underground network? We know he’s hardly choosy about who TfL gets its money from, but it seems odd to have your campaign team claim an association with Press TV is “embarrassing”, while taking advertising money from them. It may show an admirable commitment to free speech, granted, but I can’t help thinking it’s a bit inconsistent.

Written by Darryl

31 January, 2011 at 12:31 pm

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Imagine the outcry if politicians started choosing who could / couldn’t advertise on our publicly funded transport system.. ;)

    martymc

    31 January, 2011 at 12:41 pm

  2. “Imagine the outcry if politicians started choosing who could / couldn’t advertise on our publicly funded transport system.. ;)”

    Didn’t Ken do exactly that, telling Sandals that they couldn’t advertise their romantic holidays on the tube because they banned gay couples? And he was entirely right to do so, imo.

    Tom W

    31 January, 2011 at 1:30 pm

  3. I always thought the Sandals one was a bit iffy anyway, as their holidays were largely in countries where homosexuality was either illegal, or likely to result in beatings if discovered.

    To say they have to advertise holidays for gay couples to countries where said couple had a high chance of returning to the UK in matching coffins did seem to be pushing a political point too far.

    IanVisits

    31 January, 2011 at 1:58 pm

  4. Do Sandals offer holidays to Iran? That’d tie all this up nicely.

    Darryl

    31 January, 2011 at 1:59 pm

  5. @Ian: That’s a remarkably paternalistic conception you have of Sandals’ motivations. “We’re concerned that gay people might get beaten up in our flashy Caribbean resorts, so we’re not going to let you take that risk.”

    Tom W

    31 January, 2011 at 5:43 pm

  6. You can’s pick and choose the advertiser’s you use. If you want to ban ad’s from countries which have anti-gay laws that’s about all of Africa & The Middle East. If we start to ban TV stations let’s at least start with Fox?

    Sofia Notes

    1 February, 2011 at 5:39 am


Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 503 other followers