853

news, views and issues around Greenwich, Charlton, Blackheath and Woolwich, south-east London – what you won't read in Greenwich Time

Who should run Greenwich Park?

with 5 comments

Greenwich Park at sunset

Hats off to Peninsula ward councillor Mary Mills – one of a tiny, tiny minority of Greenwich Labour representatives comfortable with speaking publicly to constituents – for letting us know about a meeting she had about Greenwich Park. One of the many topics she raises could be a big issue in the years to come, since City Hall is eyeing up the Royal Parks

Cuts were followed by a report on the move to give the Royal Parks to the London Mayor’s office which is expected to be part of an imminent Parliamentary Bill. To my mind this is crazy since it will involved the recreation of the old GLC Parks Department at vast public expense – and for what reason??? If they have to give them to anyone, the City of London administers other parks in the Greater London area and has pots and pots of cash.

At the moment, Greenwich Park is run by the Royal Parks Agency, which is run by the government. (Until recently, it even had its own police force.) It seems to do a good job, although the row over the Olympics has created lots of bad feeling. It makes much of its money through parking charges and hiring parks out for events, notably Hyde Park concerts.

There’s a precedent for handing these parks over to the mayoralty; Trafalgar Square and Parliament Square were handed over to it in 2000. This has seen great improvements in Trafalgar Square, although plans to pedestrianise Parliament Square were canned by Boris Johnson when he took office. While perhaps London’s most important parks should be run on behalf of all Londoners – Blackheath, Burgess Park and Crystal Palace Park were run by the old GLC, for example – this could submit these parks to political turbulence.

Then again, if local people having a say in running Greenwich Park is important, why not give it to Greenwich Council as a present to mark becoming a royal borough in 2012? Greenwich is one of London’s greenest boroughs, and already looks after important spaces like Plumstead Common and Oxleas Woods.

Or then there’s Mary’s suggestion that the City of London takes it on. The City crest may look out of place around Westminster, but we’re miles away from there and the corporation’s responsibilities already include the lush spaces of Hampstead Heath, Epping Forest and West Wickham Common. It certainly has money – but isn’t exactly democratic.

Anyway, what you reckon? I thought I’d try holding a poll to see what 853 readers think.

Written by Darryl

26 November, 2010 at 8:30 am

Posted in local stuff, london

Tagged with ,

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Oh Darryl – if I had known you were going to quote that I would have said other things – like that its also very strange that the Government are considering handing the Royal Parks over to the London Mayor when a previous Tory administration handed GLC managed parks over to the Boroughs.
    I should also have pointed out that the two parks on the Peninsula are currently managed by the Homes and Communities Agency although it has been suggested they will be passed eventually to a non-profit making trust.
    You are also quite right about the non-democratic nature of all of these bodies – including, of course, the quango that currently runs the Royal Parks.

    Mary

    26 November, 2010 at 12:01 pm

  2. Greenwich Park is fine as it is, and if some of the money for the upkeep of the park is being coming from money-spinning events in other Royal Parks then that’s okay with me.

    Greenwich Council would be all well and good if it weren’t putting the park in the firing line for the sort of cuts we’re seeing elsewhere. I don’t want Boris to have anything to do with it.

    Matt DC

    26 November, 2010 at 1:26 pm

  3. I’m quite tickled by the idea of the Wireless “festival” and Proms in the Park subsidising Greenwich Park, I have to say.

    Darryl

    26 November, 2010 at 1:36 pm

  4. I think the plumstead common action group might have a thing or two to say about who cares for the common, from my point of view, they end up doing things that the council and police never get round to… as for oxleas woods, the council are ill equipped to manage the place, in fact the last time the integrity of the woodland was pro-actively maintained was under the GLC, for this reason I vote for the GLA to run Greenwich Park – plus it would be good for boris to have more awareness of selondon in any way possible – his recent crossrail PR completely omitted the selondon spur, making it feel like he’s ignoring his bexley fanbase.

    hilly

    26 November, 2010 at 3:45 pm

  5. So long as the funding is in place, at a similar level as today’s via the Royal Parks Agency, Greenwich council would be my choice. Whatever anyone’s issues with the council, it is a democratically elected body — unlike the City, which is not even democratic inside the City’s boundaries.

    Alan Burkitt-Gray

    28 November, 2010 at 4:53 pm


Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 516 other followers