Greenwich Council cut fireworks cash, but kept mayor’s bash
As Lewisham Council confirms it has raised £10,000 towards the cost of next month’s Blackheath fireworks following Greenwich Council’s withdrawal, some of the sums involved have been confirmed.
Last year’s fireworks cost £104,000, Lewisham says. It and Greenwich stumped up £37,000 each, with outside sponsorship covering the remaining £30,000.
So, by withdrawing support from 2010′s event, Greenwich is looking to save in the region of £37,000. At the time, Greenwich said: “The council is committed to maintaining front line services and has a strong track record of identifying efficiency savings…”
But could Greenwich have found that money elsewhere, without dipping into front line services? Well, it’s confirmed that this May’s mayoral inauguration ceremony, held in the Painted Hall of the Old Royal Naval College, cost almost £29,500, with the sum being met in full from the council’s coffers.
The full sum, for those counting the pennies, was £29,472.75. The figures come from Freedom of Information Act requests sent to the two councils.
Obviously, this gives us a £7,500 shortfall, although we do know Greenwich has just shelled out on two costly PR campaigns for the 2012 Olympics. Lewisham tapped up local businesses – including the Clarendon Hotel – to get some of the extra money for this year’s. Let’s face it, if the will had been there, Greenwich Council could have found that money.
What happens at the mayoral inauguration? Well, as you’d guess from the name, it’s where the new mayor opens up their year’s duties. But it doesn’t have to be held in a lavish ceremony at an external venue – a mayor can simply be confirmed in office at a council meeting. But Greenwich uses its mayoral inauguration to wine and dine the great and the good – and for council leader Chris Roberts to deliver a big speech. Last year’s was so big, it even made the front of Greenwich Time…
Yup, providing the council leader with a chance to say that, for the front of his propaganda rag, cost Greenwich taxpayers nearly £30,000. Wonderful. All councillors are invited, but many don’t bother showing, either objecting to the cost or finding the whole thing a bore-fest.
So, funding a private party so the council leader can impress the great and the good, against contributing to a family event which delights 80,000 people each year?
Tough choices, indeed.
Lewisham has set itself a fundraising target of £35,000 to cover the shortfall left by Greenwich, but either way, it’s now underwriting November 6′s display so its council tax payers will be funding the cost of Greenwich’s withdrawal, whether in making up the money left over or by donating cash themselves. It’s now suggesting residents hold parties for Hallowe’en or make and sell pumpkin soup to raise the cash.
How sad that Lewisham’s residents are being asked to dress up to save Blackheath’s fireworks, all because Greenwich Council preferred to hold its own fancy-dress party instead.
To donate to Lewisham Council’s Blackheath fireworks appeal, visit www.lewisham.gov.uk/fireworks.
(WEDNESDAY UPDATE: Perhaps Greenwich could have found the cash from the £500,000 it blew on sacking 12 HR staffers, before recruiting 11 new ones… although it’s worth pointing out there is another side to that story.)
Well said, I’m disgusted by Greenwich’s actions over this and the mayoral party just about caps it off!
Clare
5 October, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Champagne Marxists.
Indigo
5 October, 2010 at 6:02 pm
Why are we even surprised by any of this? As we are all being asked to ‘tighten our belts’, how many ‘politicians’ of any party and any level taking pay cuts themselves? Even without a freedom of information request I bet it’s not even 1.
Lead by example not by threat, Mr Roberts, Mr Cameron et al.
Dazza
5 October, 2010 at 10:25 pm
Ouch! Nice work.
Deptford Dame
6 October, 2010 at 9:18 am
This rag is a total waste of time/money/effort. I’d argue that 90% of the papers are pulped before they’re even read. In my block we have 8 flats, and everytime a new copy of that paper comes out I see 7 routinely dumped on the window sill for the clear to dump. I’m yet to figure out who’s reading it, I’d hazard a guess it’s the gent downstairs with a new kitten and he’s lining the litter tray with it.
Mark
7 October, 2010 at 7:37 pm
[...] to freeze staff pay for four years and is halving its funding for voluntary bodies. Funding for Blackheath fireworks has been pulled – leaving Lewisham with a £36k shortfall which it’s now trying to fill [...]
Greenwich and the cuts – some early observations « 853
20 October, 2010 at 6:56 pm
[...] following the Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review.” That didn’t stop it blowing nearly £30,000 on a private party for its new mayor earlier this year, of [...]
Greenwich Time behind times with Blackheath fireworks « 853
26 October, 2010 at 11:12 am
[...] Alex Wilson didn’t ask why, despite the “current financial climate”, the council felt the need to spend £30,000 on its lavish private do for the mayor in May – which equates to a job. It also does seem odd that Peter Brooks is complaining about only [...]
Greenwich ‘had two days to decide on Blackheath fireworks’ « 853
28 October, 2010 at 11:56 am
[...] course, nobody in the chamber bothered to ask him why it was appropriate for the council to splash out nearly £30,000 on a private party for the mayor and council leader in May. @smalltown2kChris O Also: @greenwichcouncl how was the [...]
Was that the last Blackheath fireworks display? « 853
8 November, 2010 at 8:31 am
[...] we know Greenwich Council is happy to spend money on a mayoral booze-up instead of contributing its rightful sum to a fireworks party which attracts 100,000 people to the [...]
To Greenwich via Belarus – a £5,700 iPhone app « 853
10 November, 2010 at 11:52 am
[...] it’s very hard to make that point when you’re spending £30,000 on mayoral booze-ups and £15,000 on a bunch of comedians. Hopefully seeing their decisions pushed into centre stage [...]
Festivals gained, fireworks lost council cash « 853
23 November, 2010 at 8:32 am
[...] fireworks claiming it was due to cutbacks, but we know this was nonsense – with the council having blown the cash on a mayoral booze-up and Olympics-linked arts projects. It’s easy – too easy, really – to criticise [...]
Kicking off in Catford as Lewisham makes cuts « 853
30 November, 2010 at 1:31 am
[...] funding Blackheath fireworks (page 142) (Interestingly, there’s no plans to cut the expensive mayoral inauguration ceremony, despite it coming from the same pot of cash.) – cutting one of the four staff who work for the [...]
Revealed: Greenwich council’s plans for cuts « 853
7 December, 2010 at 12:33 pm
greenwich council chief excutive?mary nye, 180.000 pa salary,does greenwich really need a chief executive,sack her and employ 8 staff @ 20.000 pa,& do we need chris roberts? who fails to attend council meetings?
john wilson
17 December, 2010 at 2:13 pm
[...] mentioned several times on this blog, Greenwich Council spends nearly £30,000 each year on a mayoral inauguration ceremony at the Old Royal Naval College. Most councils don’t bother with this, and have a short [...]
Greenwich Council cuts: Maryon Wilson Park petition « 853
19 January, 2011 at 1:32 pm
[...] a comment » The next mayor of Greenwich, Jim Gillman, has asked council officials to cancel a £30,000 inauguration ceremony in his honour as the borough faces up to over £60m in government-enforced [...]
Greenwich’s next mayor wants to axe £30k ceremony « 853
31 January, 2011 at 11:00 pm
[...] year’s event at the prestigious Greenwich venue cost £30,000 to stage, angering residents protesting against cuts to council services. Most other councils hold the [...]
Greenwich Council plans lavish mayor’s party – despite £48m cuts « 853
26 April, 2011 at 11:47 am
[...] including cuts to funding for youth, children’s and voluntary services, as well as the Blackheath fireworks and Maryon Wilson animal park in [...]
Demonstrators target Greenwich Council mayor’s party « 853
17 May, 2011 at 11:52 am
[...] cutbacks and austerity. But if it’s now costing £10,000, why didn’t it cost £10,000 last year? There are still questions to be asked. It’s just a shame that Greenwich won’t engage [...]
Mayor-making: Councillor calls criticism ‘boring’ « 853
19 May, 2011 at 2:11 pm
[...] £36,000 share of the funding for an event right on its border, preferring to put the cash towards a private mayoral booze-up and the “Greenwich Festivals” programme, while pleading poverty at the same [...]
Sponsors’ cash brings Blackheath fireworks back with a bang « 853
3 October, 2011 at 7:04 am
[...] Council stopped paying its share of the bill for Blackheath fireworks last year, so it could spend the money on a behind closed doors booze-up for the mayor [...]
Text Fireworks to 70007 to help Blackheath’s big night « 853
25 October, 2011 at 11:29 am
[...] north side of the A2. Inside Greenwich Council’s area – the same council that’s refused to co-fund the fireworks for the second year [...]
Blackheath fireworks – how Greenwich hosted it without paying « 853
6 November, 2011 at 3:03 am