853

news, views and issues around Greenwich, Charlton, Blackheath and Woolwich, south-east London – what you won't read in Greenwich Time

Greenwich Olympics propaganda war goes on

with 12 comments

It’s been a quiet week, not much happening, it’s been raining and The Greenwich Phantom beat me to the Only Fools and Horses stuff. But you can always rely on Greenwich Council’s propaganda weekly Greenwich Time to come up with the goods…

gt1Brilliantly, you can now read Council Pravda online, so people across the country can now gawp at just what a load of shameless self-publicity it is. This week is a classic – an Olympics special! The lead is what purports to be a report from the Blackheath Halls meeting two weeks ago which Westcombe Society chairman Gordon Baker barred me from entering on the grounds that journalists weren’t allowed. Interesting.

“Local people were the first to hear of updated plans for the hosting of equestrian and modern pentathalon events at ‘stunning’ Greenwich Park in 2012,” it begins. Well, only if they’d “paid their subscriptions”, according to the Westcombe Society’s Gordon Baker.

But the byline-free front page story contains nothing more than what was in the press release Olympic organisers LOCOG issued two days after the meeting (not available on LOCOG’s website, but I’ve uploaded a copy here.) So was GT there? There’s no reaction from anyone there, no attempt to see what local protesters think. Indeed, Gordon Baker told me there were no journalists at all. (The Mercury carried a decent report last week, which looks like it was written after the event – the News Shopper didn’t, although it did run something about a safety barrier going up for the Woolwich shooting.)

Is it Greenwich Council’s job to act as a cheerleader for the London 2012? In some respects, it is because the Olympics will hopefully attract prestige and investment into the borough.

gt4But when dealing with its residents, Greenwich Council’s job surely is to safeguard their interests, to ensure that the area will not be damaged by the games, to explain to people just what they can expect in the summer of 2012, and to make sure the value of holding the Olympics is worth the undoubted inconvenience it will cause. With blatant propaganda like this, the council is failing on all of those points.

We know those who paid to be members of the Blackheath Society, Westcombe Society and Greenwich Society have had a briefing from LOCOG. Greenwich councillors also had a separate briefing the same day. But what about the rest of us? When do we get to meet LOCOG in a hall and discuss things? Or are we only fit to be told edited highlights?

Greenwich Time then rachets up the pro-Olympics heat with a page 3 interview with “respected community champion Judy Smith MBE” – it’s not explained to us why she’s so respected or how she’s a champion and of which community, although it looks like somewhere like Eltham, so we’ll just have to take GT’s word for it. Again. “It’s just as important for the people of Eltham and the south of the borough to have these guarantees about Greenwich Park, because the whole borough uses and enjoys it, not just people from Greenwich.” Well, good to hear it. No comment from people in Lewisham or Blackheath Village who live on the park’s doorstep but don’t live in the borough, mind. Maybe they don’t count?

And then there’s a piece with Greenwich Park’s manager, who’s been a loud advocate of the games all along, and then there’s pieces with local business leaders about the opportunities ahead. Any dissenting voices? Of course not. This is Greenwich Time. Dissent isn’t allowed. And with its newspaper having the widest distribution of any in the area, it’s nothing less than an abuse of power by Greenwich Council.

This is what happens when local media dies – the Mercury a pale shadow of its former self and exiled to Streatham, the News Shopper badly out of touch in Orpington, both hurt by the rise of Greenwich Time – and nobody blows the whistle on this kind of propaganda.

On the other side of the debate, supporters of anti-Olympics pressure group NOGOE haven’t been shy of playing around with the truth either. They’re bound to score a decent amount of publicity for their “ring around the park” on Sunday, and they’re very pleased with their 12,000-strong petition against the equestrian events in the park. But if you didn’t know all the facts about what’ll happen in 2012, and someone came up to you and said A Very Bad Thing will happen to the park, and we all must save it, then of course you’d sign their petition, wouldn’t you? They’ve also released a video – made in August, so it’s dated slightly. But that’s not stopping them…

“None of us know how long the park will be closed for,” someone is seen saying. But we do know how long the park will be closed for in 2012 – four weeks. It is a shame nobody thought to re-edit the video when the facts changed. This does not do their campaign any good.

But on both sides of the Greenwich Olympics debate, facts are the last thing anyone seems to want to deal with. Without a strong, independent local media, and until LOCOG steps up its game in terms of talking to the people of Greenwich, by holding meetings for the public and the press, it’s going to stay that way.

UPDATE 6.30pm:
Credit to north-of-the-Thames freesheet The Docklands (which gets a limited run in Greenwich as The Peninsula) for getting LOCOG’s view on NOGOE’s video. “It’s scaremongering as usual,” a spokesperson told reporter Marina Thomas. However, if LOCOG really does want to overcome this, it needs to be a bit more proactive in talking to the people of Greenwich, instead of waiting for journalists to ring them. Because around there, there’s precious few that will do that…

12 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Great to see that they even managed to get an angle for the entertainment pages!

    Deptford dame

    8 October, 2009 at 1:20 pm

  2. this is probably not how olympic tickets work, but could local residents be offered free or cheap tickets to see the shooting/horses?

    at least that might make the inconvenience a bit less intolerable?

    hilly

    9 October, 2009 at 9:09 am

  3. that video is as irksome as the greenwich meantime rag.

    while I have some sympathy with the cause their angle seems to be that the world as we know will come to an end, old people will be left abandoned in the streets, small children will be murdered in their beds by cars and the lord sauron will take over sweet middle earth led by marauding orcs.

    I was left wondering whether this was the most profitable use of their time.

    A different tom

    9 October, 2009 at 10:57 am

  4. I don’t know why anyone believes the “closed for only four weeks” line presently being put out by LOCOG? I mean, use your noddle: if you had to build a 23,000-seat stadium, together with all the auxiliary stuff like media centres, hospitality suites, doping-test centres, vet clinics, etc etc, how long do you think it would take? If you had to carve out and prepare a cross-country track to Olympic standard (those horses are worth half a million each, and the going has to be like silk) that wound all over the Park, how much time would you allow for the job? Then there has to be a trial event in the year before the Olympics, for which the Park will be closed.

    Ergo, commonsense tells you that much of the Park will be closed to us for most of two years, including closed completely once the security sweeps have been made before the start of the Olympics. Then, how long do you imagine it takes to dismantle a 23,000-seat stadium and take it away on lorries? that can’t be done with the public wandering in and out.

    As for the assurances about trees and habitat being preserved – well, on the main Olympic site trees and habitat have been destroyed, despite assurances that they would not be, BECAUSE THEY GOT IN THE WAY.

    As to the idea of free tickets for locals – I think that, at best, there will be a token number like 6 pairs – not more and probably none at all, because the Park is too small to allow the organisers to have as many people paying to watch live from stands (there isn’t room) as they would want.

    Indigo

    12 October, 2009 at 10:33 pm

  5. Indigo is using exactly the sort of dissembling sophistry which this post complains about.

    Windsor Great Park, Burghley and Badminton all manage to build their temporary stadiums and arenas in just a week to 10 days before their annual Three Day events. And that includes “all the auxiliary stuff like media centres, hospitality suites, doping-test centres, vet clinics, etc etc”.

    The scale will be slighly more Olympian, but then so will be the resources available. So there is no reason to assume that arena construction and course building in Greenwich will take any longer than four weeks in 2012.

    Or to suggest, as Indigo has done, that Paul Deighton and LOCOG are lying about this. What evidence does Indigo have for making such an assertion?

    Yet he manages to go in to full scaremongering mode by ramping up a four-week closure in 2012 to two years. Oh, do come on: what absolute nimbyism from some of the well-heeled of Blackheath.

    RedRum

    13 October, 2009 at 11:20 am

  6. Indigo is absolutely right. I quoting now the “official” LOCOG document:

    “Work is likely to begin on the
    installation of a temporary Arena in
    the north of the Park in March/April
    2012. From this date onwards some
    parts of the Park will be cordoned off
    as we continue our preparations but
    we don’t envisage closing the Park
    completely until July 2012.”

    That means that large parts of the park are closed much longer than four weeks. And in any case: what does “we don’t envisage” actually mean? What guarantees are there that they don;t close the park earlier? Just think of TFL envisaging to finish the Jubilee line upgrade in March 2009. Please also note that the main problems are caused by the cross country event and not so much by the stadium.

    C

    13 October, 2009 at 12:29 pm

  7. In particular my previous comment should also make clear that the video of the Nogoe campaign is still correct as the parts of the park will be closed much longer than four weeks and that nobody knows how long the park will be actually closed. (The only thing we know is that LOCOG “envisages” not more than four weeks of complete closure)

    C

    13 October, 2009 at 12:31 pm

  8. We know that the northern bit of the park will be lost for several months. But the full park closure is four weeks. To imply otherwise, as NOGOE has consistently done, is misleading.

    And to imply an “up to two year” closure is staggering.

    darryl853

    13 October, 2009 at 12:41 pm

  9. [...] in Greenwich Council undermine their efforts every time they up their own propaganda – their Greenwich Time special was every bit as misleading as some of NOGOE’s supporters’ …. It could be argued pressure from NOGOE has forced some concessions on the course and park closures [...]

  10. [...] had a great post criticising the weakness of local media in the SE, and Greenwich Time specifically. Also raises some very good points about the cost of entry into [...]

  11. [...] a comment » Greenwich Council’s pro-Olympics propaganda is pretty laughable, we’ve [...]

  12. [...] It’s always sad when a relationship breaks down – but this one’s got a tale of rejection behind it too. Remember the happy days when Greenwich Council were trumpeting everying Olympic organisers LOCOG said uncritically? [...]


Hello! Please join the discussion below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 465 other followers