Archive for November 2008
So, chugging through the nasty retail park on the peninsula on the way home from a miserable game of football the other night, and what should I see from the bus window? Some men up a crane next to the Greenwich Odeon (nee Filmworks). Another change of moniker? Nope. They were attaching a new word to the sign. “IMAX”.
Yup, the Odeon in Greenwich has now got an Imax screen. I wonder what we’ve done to deserve that honour? Well, it’s probably more proof of the big competition for bums on cinema seats around here. The economy’s shrinking, everything’s gloomy, but it’s boomtime if you want to see a (Hollywood) movie in SE10.
It wasn’t always this way. Greenwich Council had to help fund the original Greenwich Cinema when it opened in the late 1980s (“built by this council for your enjoyment”, a voiceover trilled before every film, accompanied by an obselete council logo). The 1970s and 1980s saw the closure of cinemas in Blackheath (the Roxy, on Old Dover Road), Woolwich (the ABC), Lewisham and Deptford. The multiplex revolution had yet to hit town, and old stagers like the Woolwich and Well Hall Coronets staggered on, along with ABCs in Catford and Sidcup.
But the 1990s saw those old screens wiped out as multiplexes marched in at Surrey Quays and Bexleyheath (since Catford’s demise, Lewisham borough has no cinemas, although there’s a few just beyond its boundaries). And finally, the multiplex came to Greenwich with the Filmworks (now Odeon) in 2001. Big, glitzy, and spotless, it was a world away from the smelly old Woolwich Coronet. Greenwich Cinema, by now looking tatty, shut its doors in 2002 when its owners went under, re-emerging as the Picturehouse three years later.
I heard somewhere that the Odeon was one of, if not, the busiest cinemas in the country. I’ve not been there for a few years, because I can’t think of anywhere worse to spend an evening than a retail park, but its easy to see why it does such a good trade – huge car park and not much competition for miles around. Until last year, its nearest competition south of the river was in awkward Surrey Quays or distant Bexleyheath.
When the Dome became the O2 last year, up stepped some competition for the all-conquering Odeon. The Vue‘s Screen 11 is the biggest in the country – I saw Quantum of Solace on it last month and it wasn’t bad at all, although the cinema’s fiddly to find your way around.
So we have two huge chains on our doorstep, and one smaller one down the road. Are we spoilt for choice? Not really. Both the big chains are showing pretty much identical fare (although you can see Mamma Mia! again at the Odeon and the Vue is still showing Burn After Reading, but only late at night). They’re both even showing Bollywood movie Dostana. Is the Picturehouse offering that much different? It’s the only place showing Waltz With Bashir consistently, and there’s patchy screenings of Easy Virtue and The Baader-Meinhof Complex, but… it’s tough justifying £11 for Bond, Changeling and Body of Lies when you can see them up the road for cheaper.
How do the cinemas fight, then? On technology and ambience. The Vue has its great mega-screen, the Odeon now has its Imax which might tempt me back inside for a look… and the Picturehouse? It doesn’t have the plebs that attend the other two, I suppose they’d like to say but can’t. I actually prefer the Picturehouse because the staff are good, I like its bar, and it’s much nicer going to the cinema in a town centre rather than a car park or the sterile O2. But then if it’s showing the same films as the other two places… I’ll probably start to vote with my wallet.
At least, however, we’ve got three good cinemas that are actively trying to pull in the crowds. Those of us who remember dismal blind dates at the Sidcup ABC (King Ralph) or smuggling booze into the Woolwich Coronet (some Star Trek film, I think) can at least appreciate how much better things are. Hopefully they’ll survive the tough times ahead – and develop to offer us a bit more choice. Picturehouse bosses, I hope you’re reading…
A week to the Greenwich Olympics consultation meeting at the Dome, and the official organ of Greenwich Council is as even-handed as ever about it…
To be fair, this is next to an ad for the event saying experts will be there to “answer questions”, but the copy’s pretty unambiguous. Now, I don’t receive any other local newspaper. It’d be perfectly possibly to go around unaware there was large-scale opposition to the Greenwich Park plans along with some well-founded scepticism. But you won’t read it in Greenwich Time.
Which is a huge problem for London 2012′s organisers. The wild bias shown by Greenwich Council only creates the impression that there’s something to hide. From my conversation with a LOCOG person last week, it seems they’re pretty sincere about listening to people’s concerns about the site. I hope I’m right, and I hope they’re held to every last one of their promises. But with friends like the council – elected to represent the people, and not Sebastian Coe – they don’t need enemies.
My neighbouring blogger Charlton Average was tickled to discover his corner of the world featured on BBC1 spy drama Spooks the other night – featuring the unsightly parade of overspilling, uncollected bins that he spent much of 2008 haranguing the useless chumps at Greenwich Council about. Go and see, he’s got pictures and everything.
Anyway, this got me thinking… the council’s (rightly) lauded for the work its film unit does in bringng this area to the big and small screen. Maybe the lack of decent bin collection was deliberate? “Hello! I’m from the BBC. Do you have anywhere nasty and unkempt where we can film our top-rated crime drama?” “Well, now you mention it…”
While we prepare to choke/ rev up our Chelsea tractors (delete as applicable), this comment on Dave Hill’s blog made me chuckle…
If the residents of West London want to be able to drive freely around their area and allow the rest of the same privilege well good for them. In return can the rest of us who live elsewhere have a referendum on them driving their filthy tractors in our areas for free. Let’s charge them for driving outside of their zone. Just becasue they want to be able to drive around their area it doesn’t mean I want them driving around mine. I say let them have no C-Charge in their area and let’s charge them to leave it. And leave it they do, on their way out of London to their weekend cottages.
Incidentally, guff about “manifesto commitments” aside, I wonder how much the opening of the Westfield London mega-mall just outside the zone, and the threat it poses to businesses around that way, had to do with the decision?
It hit fame in the cult 60s film Blow-Up, but now Charlton’s Maryon Park is a looking a bit tatty around the edges. But now, like a blond avenger, Boris Johnson, no less, is offering some cash to help do it up. And hopefully the council will accept the cash and make it a bit nicer, yes?
(Other parks which could get cash include Avery Hill Park in Eltham, Deptford Park, Camberwell Green, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Coram’s Fields and Victoria Park.)
So I popped along to the Olympics consultation in Greenwich Park, and was fairly reassured by what I heard. The main thrust of what the 2012 organisers want to do, as I saw it…
- A part of the park (the flat area at the foot of the hill) will be closed for several months for construction of a 20,000-capacity stadium. But the whole park will have to be closed from two weeks before the Olympics for it to be converted into the cross-country course.
- No trees will be cut down, they say, but some low-hanging branches will have to be cut down.
- The current course involves a route through the flower garden, because the duck pond is proposed as a water feature. This may be changed, because people are worried about the flower garden, with the boating lake replacing it as a water feature instead.
So, here’s what I reckon this all comes down to. Is losing Greenwich Park for six weeks or so a price worth paying for us to be hosting a major Olympic event? And if we decide it is, then the organisers must be held to their every word about restoring the park to its previous glory.
Like I said before, this debate isn’t helped by the extreme viewpoints involved – the Evening Standard misery corps on one side, Greenwich Council on the other. LOCOG had a press day on Friday and showed the local freesheets around, but they’ll need to get their act together if they’re to overcome a tide of local scepticism.
And it dawned on me earlier that councillors from all three main parties represent wards which adjoin or include Greenwich Park (Tories and Labour in Blackheath Westcombe, Labour in Greenwich West and Peninsula, and Lib Dems in Lewisham’s Blackheath ward). I don’t think we’ve heard a peep out of them, which is sad.
I’m on the fence about the plans for Greenwich Park to be an Olympic venue – I’m proud to see the old girl selected, but very worried about some of the rumours I’ve heard about the damage it may cause and lengthy closures of all or part of the park.
Unfortunately, the lack of decent independent local media in Greenwich, and the bad joke that is London’s regional media means it’s hard to know what the truth is.
On one side, the Evening sub-Standard, forever looking for scare stories about the tiniest thing. On the other, the bullshit machine that is Greenwich Council, publishing ludicrous stories in its propaganda rag Greenwich Time assuring us that everything will be alright.
I suspect the Stunted won’t be happy unless the Olympics are a disaster, and Greenwich Council would quite happily allow all of the park to be concreted over if it meant their leader got his face on the news. Of course, I exaggerate, but neither party is bringing anything worthwhile to the debate.
It doesn’t help when the BBC’s local news service for London leads its report on a basketball arena that doesn’t even exist yet, either. (South of the river? Where is that again?)
But with a whole one day’s notice comes news that the Olympic organisers will be in the Pavillion Tea Rooms on Friday (tomorrow) and Saturday from 10am-4pm to talk to people and explain what’s happening. I’m not quite sure who they expect to attract during a working day, but that’s “consultation” for you.
Secondly, there’s a public meeting at the Indigo venue inside the Dome/O2 on the evening of Tuesday 4th December to discuss the plans for the Olympic venues in Greenwich borough. If you want to go, you need to register for tickets here.
If you can, go. Like the Greenwich Phantom says – whatever happens, they can’t be allowed to get away with damaging our park.
Well, if everyone else can do it, so can I.
Stockwell’s finest, Onionbagblogger, has recently got hold of a Flip camera – so you can see just what the internet was invented for; Gower Street to Stockwell in four minutes by bike. See also his venture into a surgery with a grisly difference…
How would you spend £10,000 to make Brockley better? Brockley Central asks the question. Can’t see Greenwich Council doing something like that any day between here and the end of the world…
Go and find some postboxes. You know you want to.
On Facebook? Live in Charlton? Well join this campaign to stop the shit – say no to dog mess in Charlton, inspired by a mother who found her baby daughter covered in poo after a trip to the park…
This group will campaign to firstly create dog exclusion zones around small areas of Maryon Wilson Park and in Hornfair in Charlton, SE7. And lobby Greenwich Council to issue dog fouling notices in both green spaces. This group is not anti dog, just pro children and aims to provide a quality space for both.
Having trod in a dollop last night, and having noticed a steep upsurge in merde over the past 18 months or so (generally – but not exclusively – caused by youths wanting a stern dog to demonstrate their virility), it’s struck a chord with me (and my soiled Campers).
Ever seen some buildings go up in your neighbourhood and wonder how the hell they got permission for those? I get it all the time around Charlton and Greenwich. The most notorious example, for me, is the misleadingly-monikered Greenwich Retail Park on Bugsbys Way – if anyone asked me if I wanted nine retail barns and the traffic jams they cause on my doorstep, I’d have told them where to stick them. But I wasn’t given the chance, and Greenwich Council managed to lumber us with more traffic. Not that my complaint alone would have changed matters, but people like to feel involved. And when they get involved, they have more respect for the decision-making process.
Well, this year, Greenwich became one of the last authorities in London to put its planning applications online – instead of having to haul yourself along to its miserable bunker at Peggy Middleton House, Woolwich, you can now browse all the paperwork from the comfort of your own chair.
If you want to be tipped off about things happening in your area, then sign up to PlanningAlerts.com, stick in your postcode, and it’ll scan the council’s database and let you know when something’s in. It’s great. (PlanningAlerts.com is a service from the wonderful MySociety, whose top brains are behind the brilliant FixMyStreet, TheyWorkForYou, the Downing Street petitions site and, err… a Charlie Brooker-only version of the Guardian’s site).
So, without it, I wouldn’t have found out about this plan to plonk some more retail barns on Bugsbys Way, and had the chance to drop the council a line about it. Good, eh?